Kritikan Sanad Terhadap Riwayat Abu Yazid Al-Bisthomi Dalam Silsilah Tarekat Naqsyabandiyah
Criticism of the Sanad Concerning the Narration of Abu Yazid al-Bisthami in the Naqshbandi Tariqa Chain
Keywords:
Naqshbandi, Spiritual lineage of the Sufi order, Syeikh Nazim al-Haqqani, Narrators, Narrators of hadith, Hadith terminology (Mustalah al- Hadith), Authentic HadithAbstract
Abu Yazid al-Bistami is one of the narrators listed in the Naqshbandi Sufi order’s spiritual lineag). A connected chain of transmission (ittisāl al-sanad) is a fundamental condition in determining the authenticity of any sanad. Hadith scholars have established that the first criterion for a hadith to be deemed sahih (authentic) is an unbroken chain of reliable narrators. However, there are several instances within the Naqshbandi spiritual lineage that reveal breaks or disconnections in the chain of transmission. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the sanad of the Naqshbandi order and examine the chain of narrators involved, with specific attention to the direct connections between each narrator, ensuring no disjunctions occur. The study also seeks to understand the implications of such findings on the validity of the sanad based on the principles of hadith sciences (ʿulūm al-ḥadīth). In terms of methodology, this research adopts a detailed textual analysis of the Naqshbandi sanad, particularly focusing on the relationship between each narrator and their immediate predecessor. A critical approach towards hadith sources is employed to assess the strength and integrity of the chain. Research data is gathered through library research and analysed systematically. The findings of this study are hoped to contribute to a clearer understanding of the reliability criteria for a sanad in the context of hadith scholarship, and to provide useful guidance to hadith scholars and researchers. Ultimately, the quality of the sanad in the Sufi order of Shaykh Nazim al-Haqqani is found to be weak, particularly due to the disconnected links, which adversely affect the credibility of certain Sufi lineages, including that of Shaykh Nazim al-Haqqani.
Downloads
References
Al-Akiti, M. A. 2022. Sanad Naqsyabandiyah Terputus Pada Saydina Al-Qasim & Sayyidina Salman Al-Farisi?. [Video]. Youtube. www.youtube.com/watch?v=6hNUJyrNSwQ
[Video]. Youtube. www.youtube.com/watch?v=55fwqYGWU5Q
Abd Kadir, F., & Shamsudin, R. (2022). Manhaj Kritikan Muḥaddithūn Terhadap Riwayat Sirah Dan Penerapannya Dalam Penulisan Sirah. Maʿālim al-Qurʾān wa al-Sunnah, 18(1), 47-70.
Al- Zahabi. 2001. Siyaru ‘Alamu an-Nubala’. Muassasah al-Risalah.
Anshori, M. 2016. Kajian Ketersambungan Sanad (Ittişāl Al-sanad). Jurnal Living Hadis, 1(2), 294-323.
Azizan, A. S. M., Nor, Z. M., & Hamdan, M. A. M. (2024). Metodologi Kritikan Sanad Riwayat Sirah. Journal Of Hadith Studies, 81-89.
Badrul al-Din, ibn Jamaah. 1985. Al-Manhal al-Ruwi fi Mukhtasar 'Ulum al-Hadith al-Nabawi. Ed. Dr. Muhyiddin Abdul Rahman Ramadan. Cet. II. Dimashq: Dar al-Fikr.
bin Azlan, U., & bin Aris, H. (2024). Kepentingan Menganalisis Status Perawi Hadis Dengan Neraca Ilmu Al-Jarh Wa Al-Ta’dil: Tumpuan Terhadap Status Periwayatan Abu Hanifah. Journal Of Hadith Studies, 110-120.
Dzulraidi, D. H. (2025). Metodologi Muslim Bin Al-Hajjāj Dalam Kritik Perawi: Kajian Terhadap Muqaddimah Sahīh Muslim. UMRAN-Journal of Islamic and Civilizational Studies, 12(1), 1-16.
Ibn abdilbar. 1960. Al-Isti‘ab fi Ma‘rifat al-Aṣḥab. Ed. ‘Ali Muḥ.ammad al-Bijawi Dar al-Jil. Beirut – Lubnān.
Ibn Abi Hatim. 1952. al-Jarḥ wa al-Taʻdīl. Majlis Daʼirat al-Maʻarif al-ʻUthmaniyah, bi-Ḥ.aydar Abad al-Dakan - al- Hind.
Ibn al-Athir. 1989. Usdu al-Ghabah fī Ma‘rifat al-Ṣaḥabah. Ed. Muḥ.ammad Ibrāhīm al-Bannā - Muḥ.ammad Aḥ.mad ‘Āshūr - Maḥ.mūd ‘Abd al-Wahhāb Fāyid. Dār al-Fikr, Bayrūt – Lubnān.
Ibn al-Salah. 1972. ‘Ulum al-Hadith. Madinah: al-Maktabah al-Ilmiyah.
Ibn al-Salah. 2002. Muqaddimah Ibn al-Salah fī Ulum al-Ḥadith. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiyah, cet-II. Ibn Hajar, al-‘Asqalani. 2020. Nukhbat al-Fikr fi Mustalah Ahl al-Athar. Cet. II.
Ibn Manjawaiyh. 1987. Rijāl Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim. Ed. Abd Allāh al-Laythī. Dār al-Ma‘rifah - Bayrūt Kamaruddin Amin, 2009. Menguji Kembali Keakrutan Metode Kritik Hadis. Jakarta: PT . Mizan Publika.
Kudhori, M. 2018. Metode Kashf Dalam Penilaian Hadis: Studi Tashih Hadis Di Kalangan Kaum Sufi. Afkaruna: Indonesian Interdisciplinary Journal of Islamic Studies, 14(1), 27-48.
M Azizan, A. S., Nor, Z. M., & Mohd Hamdan, M. A. 2024. Metodologi Kritikan Sanad Riwayat Sirah: Satu Kajian Terhadap Akram Ḍ.iyā’alʿumarī Dalam Karyanya Al-Sīrah Alnabawiyyah Al-Ṣ.aḥ.īḥ.ah. Journal of Hadith Studies (25501448), 9(1).
M. Syuhudi Ismail. 1988. Kaedah Kesahihan Sanad Hadith: Telaah kritis dan Tinjauan dengan pendekatan Ilmu Sejarah. Jakarta: Bulan Bintang.
Muhammad Anas. 2019. Qabul al-Hadith wa Raddihi ‘Ind Ibn ‘Arabi; al-Tashih bi al-Kasyf wa Manzilatuhu min Nazariah al-Isnad. Muktamar Ibn al-‘Arabi al-Duali.
Muhammad Asri Yusoff. 2016. Sesi 44 - Tentang Membunuh Orang-orang Perempuan - [Sunan Abi Daud – Kitab Jihad]
Muslim, Abu al-Hajjaj. 1955. Sahih Muslim. Kaherah. Ed. Abdul Baqi.
Nadhiran, H. 2014. Kritik Sanad Hadis: Tela’ah Metodologis. Jurnal Ilmu Agama: Mengkaji Doktrin, Pemikiran, Dan Fenomena Agama, 15(1), 91-109.
Rahim, Z. N. A., Wazir, N. S. M., Solihan, S. B., & Rosman, N. N. N. (2017). Kritikan Goldziher Terhadap Riwayat Abu Hurairah: Analisis Terhadap Hadith Anjing Tanaman. Journal Of Hadith Studies.
Rahman, M. S. 2016. Kajian Matan Dan Sanad Hadits Dalam Metode Historis. Jurnal Ilmiah Al-Syir'ah, 8(2).
Ramli, R. 2023, December 27. Kesan Tarekat Yang Bercanggah Dengan Ahli Al-Sunnah Wa Al-Jama’h. [Video]. Youtube. www.youtube.com/watch?v=mvz3u8GfxqY
Ridzuan, A. R., Sharipp, M. T. M., Suyurno, S. S., & Aini, Z. 2021. Adaptasi Syarat Hadith Sahih Sebagai Kaedah Penentu Kesahihan Komunikasi Maklumat Islam. Journal of Islamic, Social, Economics and Development, 6(41).
Salman, A. (2022). Salman Ali VS Arg: Pemikiran Sheikh Nazim Al-Haqqani - Menurut Ahlus Sunnah Wal Jamaah. [Video]. Youtube. www.youtube.com/watch?v=VhYHg5uW4vA
Sari, M. R. 2020. Dampak Penyebaran Hadis Lemah dan Palsu dalam Tatanan Kehidupan Bermasyarakat. El- Sunnah: Jurnal Kajian Hadis dan Integrasi Ilmu, 1(1), 99-110.
Suryadilaga, M. A. 2014. Kajian Hadis Di Era Global. Esensia, 15(2), 199-211.
Zulkifli, M., Abd Rahman, M. F., & Rushihi, A. A. 2022. Analisis Perbandingan Taṣ.ḥ. īḥ. Hadith dari Perspektif Kaedah Kasyaf Ahli Sufi dan Syarat-syarat Penerimaan Hadith Menurut Ulama Hadith. Al-Takamul al- Ma’rifi, 5(1), 1-15.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Mohamad Hafiz Darpen , Muaz Bin Mohd Ghani Basri, Ali Bin Abdul Jalil

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.